linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/20] ARM: LPAE: Use PMD_(SHIFT|SIZE|MASK) instead of PGDIR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1290430810.29754.9.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:00:10 +0000
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/20] ARM: LPAE: Use PMD_(SHIFT|SIZE|MASK) instead
 of PGDIR_*

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 12:43 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:00:21PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > index 8c19595..40b386c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static inline void identity_mapping_add(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long start,
> >       if (cpu_architecture() <= CPU_ARCH_ARMv5TEJ && !cpu_is_xscale())
> >               prot |= PMD_BIT4;
> > 
> > -     for (addr = start & PGDIR_MASK; addr < end;) {
> > +     for (addr = start & PMD_MASK; addr < end;) {
> >               pmd = pmd_offset(pgd + pgd_index(addr), addr);
> >               pmd[0] = __pmd(addr | prot);
> >               addr += SECTION_SIZE;
> > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static inline void identity_mapping_del(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long start,
> >       unsigned long addr;
> >       pmd_t *pmd;
> > 
> > -     for (addr = start & PGDIR_MASK; addr < end; addr += PGDIR_SIZE) {
> > +     for (addr = start & PMD_MASK; addr < end; addr += PMD_SIZE) {
> >               pmd = pmd_offset(pgd + pgd_index(addr), addr);
> >               pmd[0] = __pmd(0);
> >               pmd[1] = __pmd(0);
> ...
> > @@ -1068,12 +1068,12 @@ void setup_mm_for_reboot(char mode)
> >               base_pmdval |= PMD_BIT4;
> > 
> >       for (i = 0; i < FIRST_USER_PGD_NR + USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; i++, pgd++) {
> > -             unsigned long pmdval = (i << PGDIR_SHIFT) | base_pmdval;
> > +             unsigned long pmdval = (i << PMD_SHIFT) | base_pmdval;
> >               pmd_t *pmd;
> > 
> > -             pmd = pmd_off(pgd, i << PGDIR_SHIFT);
> > +             pmd = pmd_off(pgd, i << PMD_SHIFT);
> >               pmd[0] = __pmd(pmdval);
> > -             pmd[1] = __pmd(pmdval + (1 << (PGDIR_SHIFT - 1)));
> > +             pmd[1] = __pmd(pmdval + (1 << (PMD_SHIFT - 1)));
> >               flush_pmd_entry(pmd);
> >       }
> > 
> 
> This lot really does need unifying - and in any case this last addition
> should be using 'SECTION SIZE' not something related to PMD shifts.

On the classic page tables, the PMD_SHIFT is 21 while the SECTION_SHIFT
is 20. They have slightly different meaning.

But we currently have some hacks to cope with PMD_SHIFT being 21 by
writing the pmd[0] and pmd[1] in the same call. The way I see to use
SECTION_SHIFT is to drop the pmd[] array (but haven't looked closely
enough). With LPAE I have a few #ifndef around pmd[1] setting.

> Strangely, it's something I've done over the weekend...

OK, the more clean-up the better.

-- 
Catalin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/