[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101122142237.GT18100@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:22:37 -0500
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 0/6] x86, NMI: give NMI handler a face-lift
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 05:30:50PM -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 05:09 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:59 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> >>
> >> @@ -1371,6 +1385,12 @@ void __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
> >>
> >> pmu_check_apic();
> >>
> >> + /* sanity check that the hardware exists or is emulated */
> >> + if (!check_hw_exists()) {
> >> + pr_cont("no PMU driver, software events only.\n");
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >
> > Maybe report something like this:
> > "Broken PMU hardware detected, software events only."
> >
> > Because this is really not something that's supposed to happen.
>
> The kgdb test suite is passing with Don's perf detect logic, so we are
> back to good. I am in agreement with Peter about the message
> indicating that it is broken hardware. We don't in any way shape or
> form want leave the illusion this works in the VM.
>
> # dmesg |grep Per
> <6>Performance Events: no PMU driver, software events only.
>
>
> Tested on qemu and kvm, several revisions worth, because it is all
> automated.
>
> Tested-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Awesome. Thanks for the quick testing Jason.
Cheers,.
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists