[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101122175547.7cf78af1@desktopvm.lvknet>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:55:47 +0300
From: Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@....cs.msu.su>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@...msu.su>,
linuxpps@...enneenne.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 05/17] pps: access pps device by direct pointer
В Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:12:26 +0000
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> пишет:
>
> > Maybe this lock is useless... however, are we sure that before setting
> > tty->disc_data to pps its value is null? Otherwise the dcd_change may
> > be called with an oops! We cannot control serial port IRQ
> > generation... :-/
>
> tty->disc_data is LDISC private. It may be any arbitary value on entry to
> the ldisc open method.
>
>
> > > + spin_lock_irq(&pps_ldisc_lock);
> > > + tty->disc_data = NULL;
> > > + spin_unlock_irq(&pps_ldisc_lock);
>
> And you don't need to set it to NULL after - some ldiscs do this mostly
> as a debug aid.
It was a part of attempt to do a workaround. But it still is not safe
enough because it doesn't protect from a sudden ldisc change while we
are at the beginning of pps_tty_dcd_change() i.e. haven't acquired spin
lock yet. The real fix is ready, I'll send it soon.
--
Alexander
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists