linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101122151723.GA8732@elliptictech.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:17:23 -0500
From:	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Boaz Harrosh <openosd@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nathan Laredo <laredo@....org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Alessio Igor Bogani <alessioigorbogani@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up

On 2010-11-21 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yes, I'd be ok with UDF doing a "select BKL" along with a "default n"
> for BKL itself.
> 
> I think UDF currently is the only sane reason to have BKL enabled any
> more, and yes, it would probably make it easier to configure things.

UFS (which I use) also relies on BKL.

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/