| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20101122184559.GA10879@kroah.com> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:45:59 -0800 From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> Cc: stable@...nel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] [linux-pm] [git pull 2.6.36.stable] intel_idle patches for 2.6.36.stable On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 01:36:31PM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I retract my intel_idle pull requests for .stable > > The idle-release branches in... > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/ > linux-idle-2.6.32.git > linux-idle-2.6.35.git > linux-idle-2.6.36.git > > are for distros and others that want to run the latest intel_idle > driver on the specified release. The backports in these trees > contain every upstream patch that touch the driver, including new > platform support and any dependent cosmetic patches. > > So they are optimized for the maintenance task of comparing > the backport versus the upstream driver to verify the release > includes everything that is upstream. > However, as it does not exclude cosmetic or trivial patches, > the backports do not qualify for inclusion in .stable. > > Sorry to bother you. No problem at all, glad to see you change your mind :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists