[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201011221141.19250.br1@einfach.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:41:19 +0900
From: Bruno Randolf <br1@...fach.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>, linville@...driver.com,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, peterz@...radead.org, blp@...stanford.edu,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lars_Ericsson@...ia.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kevin.granade@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] nl80211/mac80211: Report signal average
On Fri November 19 2010 23:04:51 Stefan Richter wrote:
> On Nov 19 Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > Here are the results of iperf -u -c IP -b 30M -t 120
>
> You only showed that CPU utilization is not so high that an effect on
> network throughput can be seen. You did not measure what the increase
> in CPU utilization actually was. :-)
True. That's exactly the point: "CPU utilization is not so high that an effect
on network throughput can be seen", which was what people were worrying about.
So IMHO: No problem! :) But of course it makes sense to optimize and I'll try
to do that in subsequent patches.
bruno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists