[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290510680.2072.390.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:11:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: eranian@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com,
paulus@...ba.org, davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com,
robert.richter@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: add support for per-event sampling period or
frequency in perf record
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 11:45 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch allows specifying a per event sampling period or frequency.
> Up until now, the same sampling period or frequency was applied to all
> the events specified on the command line of perf record. A sampling
> period depends on the event, thus it is necessary to specify it per event.
>
> With this patch, both the -F and -c options now take a comma separated
> list of values. If a value is omitted for an event, it defaults to 1000Hz
> frequency mode as before.
>
> $ perf record -e cycles,instructions -c 100000,200000 -a -- sleep 5
I remember an email not too long ago where people proposed to change the
syntax so that:
-e evnt1,evnt2 -- create a group containing both events
-e evnt1 -e evnt2 -- create two separate events
It would be nice to make sure these two proposals will not interfere.
Alternatively we extend the event syntax to include the period,
something like:
-e evnt1:period=1234
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists