linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] da850-evm: add baseboard UI expander buttons, switches and LEDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:32:34 -0500
From:	Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@...ometrics.ca>
To:	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com" 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"Govindarajan, Sriramakrishnan" <srk@...com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Clouter <alex@...riz.org.uk>,
	Chris Cordahi <christophercordahi@...ometrics.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] da850-evm: add baseboard UI expander buttons,
 switches and LEDs

Hi Sekhar,

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Nori, Sekhar <nsekhar@...com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 19:45:46, Ben Gardiner wrote:
>> [...]
>> I was assuming that those pins were not exported as gpio pins on
>> purpose; I was taking the prudent approach to prevent haphazard
>> toggling of sw_rst and deep_sleep_en from userspace. sw_rst because it
>> could initiate a reset of the cpu when toggled and deep_sleep_en
>> because it can override the behaviour of davinci_pm_enter().
>>
>> I'm not sure how they would be used by existing kernel classes either.
>> The sw_rst pin could be used for reset but since it is on the other
>> end of an i2c bus and there is an existing implementation of reset
>> using the on chip watchdog I don't think it would be benficial to
>> switch. Deep_sleep_en could override the behaviour in
>> davinci_pm_enter() -- _maybe_ (I don't really know) it could be used
>> as a hardware-assisted suspend-blocker? But I totally guessing here.
>
> My preference would be to leave these pins as is
> (don't call a gpio_request() on them) till someone
> comes up with a use case for them. From what you
> described, sysfs access cannot happen "accidently"
> so someone accessing these pins from sysfs surely
> knows what he is doing.

No problem. I will re-spin the patch shortly with the deep_sleep_en
and sw_rst pins free for use by client code.

Best Regards,
Ben Gardiner

---
Nanometrics Inc.
http://www.nanometrics.ca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/