[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101123.103949.39186245.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:39:49 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, shemminger@...tta.com, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
adobriyan@...il.com, lennart@...ttering.net, kay.sievers@...y.org,
ian.molton@...labora.co.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] AF_UNIX: find the recipients for multicast messages
From: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:47:01 +0000
> Le Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:08:37 +0100,
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> a écrit :
>> I am not sure if doing 90 clones of skb and filtering them one by one
>> is going to be fast :-(
>
> Yes... I think it can be optimized. Run the socket filter first by
> calling sk_run_filter() directly and then call skb_clone() + pskb_trim()
> only on the few remaining sockets.
BTW, we have and have talked about the same exact problem with
AF_PACKET socket users such as DHCP.
We clone and push the packet down into the AF_PACKET protocol
code from the pt_type callback when %99 of the time the socket
filter doesn't match and thus the clone is completely wasted
work.
If we know the socket, or more specifically the filter, early enough,
we could have a special interface like:
struct sk_buff *skb_filter_or_clone(struct sk_buff *skb, ...)
Which returns a non-NULL cloned SKB if the filter accepts the
packet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists