[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101122215746.e847742d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:57:46 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mlock: release mmap_sem every 256 faulted pages
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:00:52 -0800 Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to sollicit comments on this proposal:
>
> Currently mlock() holds mmap_sem in exclusive mode while the pages get
> faulted in. In the case of a large mlock, this can potentially take a
> very long time.
A more compelling description of why this problem needs addressing
would help things along.
> + /*
> + * Limit batch size to 256 pages in order to reduce
> + * mmap_sem hold time.
> + */
> + nfault = nstart + 256 * PAGE_SIZE;
It would be nicer if there was an rwsem API to ask if anyone is
currently blocked in down_read() or down_write(). That wouldn't be too
hard to do. It wouldn't detect people polling down_read_trylock() or
down_write_trylock() though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists