linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:16:59 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>,
	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>,
	"Figo.zhang" <figo1802@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series

> If you still have a question, please ask me. maybe I can answer all of 
> your question.

Zero question?  If so, I'll resend the revert to linus.

Actually, I don't tend hear the shouting. They aren't discussion. It's
only crappy shout. Googlers have to think why no person agree their claim.
ZERO. even though >20 people discussed with them. DavidR seems to continue
to make flame. But I don't care. He have to learn making flame don't solve
ANYTHING.

And they have to learn correct discussion way and which is different of 
discusstion and shouting. and why we have to learn userland workload and
have to avoid any breakage. I'm angry googlers frequently break kernel
and frequently ignore userland claim.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/