linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] oom: create a resource limit for oom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101123160818.7B9F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:16:58 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, 7eggert@....de,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gspencer@...omium.org, piman@...omium.org, wad@...omium.org,
	olofj@...omium.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: create a resource limit for oom_adj

> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > I've sent revert patch to linus. We DON'T want to break any userland seriously. 
> > So, we reconsider about this area. personally I hope to reintroduce oom_score_adj
> > later, but It must don't break current userland.
> > 
> 
> Nobody is going to stall their development waiting for your patches to be 
> merged (especially when you've proposed them four times before and they 
> haven't been), so patches in this area should be against Linus' latest 
> tree.

Nobody want to accept you break userland.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/