[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikVhqdxD67C-g39pANSddSUi8uWygHd_iTM3iu-@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:05:02 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [thiscpuops upgrade 09/10] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg and
this_cpu_cmpxchg_double operations
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> You have to check cx16 feature flag or implement a fallback ?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> There is already a compile time fallback. Uhh.. How do I do this at
> runtime?
I think the CPU alternatives API is meant for just that. Grep for
"alternative" in arch/x86.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists