[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290594187.2072.440.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:23:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] writeback: per-task rate limit on
balance_dirty_pages()
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 12:27 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> + if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= current->nr_dirtied_pause ||
> + bdi->dirty_exceeded)) {
> + balance_dirty_pages(mapping, current->nr_dirtied);
> + current->nr_dirtied = 0;
> }
Was it a conscious choice to use
current->nr_dirtied = 0
over
current->nr_dirtied -= current->nr_dirtied_pause
?
The former will cause a drift in pause times due to truncation of the
excess.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists