[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101124113404.GA30204@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:34:05 +0000
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] MIPS: Fix CP0 COUNTER clockevent race
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:26:44AM -0800, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> write_c0_compare(read_c0_count());
>
> Even if the counter doesn't increment during execution, this might not
> generate an interrupt until the counter wraps around. The CPU may
> perform the comparison each time CP0 COUNT increments, not when CP0
> COMPARE is written.
>
> If mips_next_event() is called with a very small delta, and CP0 COUNT
> increments during the calculation of "cnt += delta", it is possible
> that CP0 COMPARE will be written with the current value of CP0 COUNT.
> If this is detected, the function should return -ETIME, to indicate
> that the interrupt might not have actually gotten scheduled.
Good catch - though on real hardware it should be theoretical as the
minimum timer interval is 300ns. So it should only be trigerable on
a very slow system like a hardware emulator or maybe if a software
emulator like qemu gets rescheduled between the update and the read-back.
Applied,
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists