[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimN1tQee2PywyphPnAdvC8_ASgZud_F=ma_+Bde@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:20:26 +0800
From: Richard Zhao <linuxzsc@...il.com>
To: Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amit.kucheria@...onical.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, eric@...rea.com,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] ARM: imx: Add core definitions for MX53
Hi Dinh,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/crm_regs.h b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/crm_regs.h
> index c776b9a..51ff9bb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/crm_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/crm_regs.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
> #define MX51_CORTEXA8_BASE MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX51_ARM_BASE_ADDR)
> #define MX51_GPC_BASE MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX51_GPC_BASE_ADDR)
>
> +/*MX53*/
> +#define MX53_DPLL4_BASE MX53_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_PLL3_BASE_ADDR)
> +
> /* PLL Register Offsets */
> #define MXC_PLL_DP_CTL 0x00
> #define MXC_PLL_DP_CONFIG 0x04
CCM and PLL base address are different between mx53 and mx51. Why do
you both use mx51 base address?
Thanks
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists