[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CED15AA.5070708@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:39:54 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
CC: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Christian Pellegrin <chripell@...e.org>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com, qi.wang@...el.com,
margie.foster@...el.com, yong.y.wang@...el.com,
kok.howg.ewe@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 16/17 v3] can: EG20T PCH: Fix incorrect return
processing
On 11/24/2010 01:24 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> Fix incorrect return processing
see comments inline
> Signed-off-by: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/pch_can.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
> index c612a99..48f4a2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
> @@ -589,10 +589,12 @@ static irqreturn_t pch_can_interrupt(int irq, void
> *dev_id)
> struct net_device *ndev = (struct net_device *)dev_id;
> struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>
> - pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_NONE);
> - napi_schedule(&priv->napi);
> -
> - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + if ((pch_can_int_pending(priv) > 0) && (dev_id != NULL)) {
> + pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_NONE);
> + napi_schedule(&priv->napi);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> + return IRQ_NONE;
My comment from the first review still applied here:
dev_id is always != NULL, because you registered your IRQ handler with
it. (BTW: dev_id has already been dereferenced in netdev_priv(), so if
this code is executed, dev_if is != NULL)
Just write:
if (!pch_can_int_pending(priv))
return IRQ_NONE;
> }
>
> static void pch_fifo_thresh(struct pch_can_priv *priv, int obj_id)
> @@ -674,7 +676,7 @@ static int pch_can_rx_normal(struct net_device
> *ndev, u32 obj_num, int quota)
> if (reg & PCH_IF_MCONT_MSGLOST) {
> rtn = pch_can_rx_msg_lost(ndev, obj_num);
> if (!rtn)
> - return rtn;
> + return rcv_pkts;
> rcv_pkts++;
> quota--;
> obj_num++;
> @@ -777,10 +779,12 @@ static int pch_can_poll(struct napi_struct *napi,
> int quota)
> goto end;
>
> if ((int_stat >= PCH_RX_OBJ_START) && (int_stat <= PCH_RX_OBJ_END)) {
> - rcv_pkts += pch_can_rx_normal(ndev, int_stat, quota);
> - quota -= rcv_pkts;
> - if (quota < 0)
> + rcv_pkts = pch_can_rx_normal(ndev, int_stat, quota);
> + if (rcv_pkts < 0) {
> + rcv_pkts = 0;
> goto end;
> + }
> + quota -= rcv_pkts;
you introduced the problem in patch "[PATCH net-next-2.6 6/17 v3] can:
EG20T PCH: Fix endianness issue", please don't do this in the first place.
( This is an example why you should split your patches and give them
proper subject.)
> } else if ((int_stat >= PCH_TX_OBJ_START) &&
> (int_stat <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END)) {
> /* Handle transmission interrupt */
cheers, Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (263 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists