[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101124162518.GA6450@lenovo>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:25:18 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: LNML <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] net, ppp: Report correct error code if unit
allocation failed
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:49:01PM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 2010-11-23 22:43, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > Allocating unit from ird might return several error codes
> > not only -EAGAIN, so it should not be changed and returned
> > precisely. Same time unit release procedure should be invoked
> > only if device is unregistering.
>
> IMHO this unit release fix should be in a separate patch.
>
I thought about it, but still think it should be addressed at
same patch. Though if a separate would be preferred still --
I've no problem in making two patches instead.
> ...
> > @@ -2668,10 +2668,10 @@ static void ppp_shutdown_interface(struc
> > ppp->closing = 1;
> > ppp_unlock(ppp);
> > unregister_netdev(ppp->dev);
> > + unit_put(&pn->units_idr, ppp->file.index);
> > } else
> > ppp_unlock(ppp);
> >
> > - unit_put(&pn->units_idr, ppp->file.index);
> > ppp->file.dead = 1;
> > ppp->owner = NULL;
> > wake_up_interruptible(&ppp->file.rwait);
>
> Btw, it seems these last 3 lines could be moved similarly.
yup, at least ppp->file.dead and ppp->owner for sure, I wanted
make this patch 'unit' orientedc and do not touch anything aside,
it should be a separate change.
>
> Jarek P.
>
Thanks for comments Jarek!
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists