| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:18:35 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] KVM: SVM: Remove nested sel_cr0_write handling code
This patch removes all the old code which handled the nested
selective cr0 write intercepts. This code was only in place
as a work-around until the instruction emulator is capable
of doing the same. This is the case with this patch-set and
so the code can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 52 +---------------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index a2c513d..b34e905 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -89,14 +89,6 @@ struct nested_state {
/* A VMEXIT is required but not yet emulated */
bool exit_required;
- /*
- * If we vmexit during an instruction emulation we need this to restore
- * the l1 guest rip after the emulation
- */
- unsigned long vmexit_rip;
- unsigned long vmexit_rsp;
- unsigned long vmexit_rax;
-
/* cache for intercepts of the guest */
u16 intercept_cr_read;
u16 intercept_cr_write;
@@ -1233,31 +1225,6 @@ static void svm_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr0)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
- if (is_nested(svm)) {
- /*
- * We are here because we run in nested mode, the host kvm
- * intercepts cr0 writes but the l1 hypervisor does not.
- * But the L1 hypervisor may intercept selective cr0 writes.
- * This needs to be checked here.
- */
- unsigned long old, new;
-
- /* Remove bits that would trigger a real cr0 write intercept */
- old = vcpu->arch.cr0 & SVM_CR0_SELECTIVE_MASK;
- new = cr0 & SVM_CR0_SELECTIVE_MASK;
-
- if (old == new) {
- /* cr0 write with ts and mp unchanged */
- svm->vmcb->control.exit_code = SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE;
- if (nested_svm_exit_handled(svm) == NESTED_EXIT_DONE) {
- svm->nested.vmexit_rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
- svm->nested.vmexit_rsp = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RSP);
- svm->nested.vmexit_rax = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
- return;
- }
- }
- }
-
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (vcpu->arch.efer & EFER_LME) {
if (!is_paging(vcpu) && (cr0 & X86_CR0_PG)) {
@@ -2546,23 +2513,6 @@ static int emulate_on_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
return emulate_instruction(&svm->vcpu, 0, 0, 0) == EMULATE_DONE;
}
-static int cr0_write_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
-{
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
- int r;
-
- r = emulate_instruction(&svm->vcpu, 0, 0, 0);
-
- if (svm->nested.vmexit_rip) {
- kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RIP, svm->nested.vmexit_rip);
- kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RSP, svm->nested.vmexit_rsp);
- kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX, svm->nested.vmexit_rax);
- svm->nested.vmexit_rip = 0;
- }
-
- return r == EMULATE_DONE;
-}
-
static int cr8_write_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
struct kvm_run *kvm_run = svm->vcpu.run;
@@ -2826,7 +2776,7 @@ static int (*svm_exit_handlers[])(struct vcpu_svm *svm) = {
[SVM_EXIT_READ_CR4] = emulate_on_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_READ_CR8] = emulate_on_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE] = emulate_on_interception,
- [SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0] = cr0_write_interception,
+ [SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0] = emulate_on_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR3] = emulate_on_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR4] = emulate_on_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR8] = cr8_write_interception,
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists