[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101124183300.GA31411@albatros>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:33:00 +0300
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti@...ia.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: vga: limit kmalloc'ed memory size
Andrew,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> What I'm suggesting is that we simply do
>
> kbuf = strndup_user(buf, count);
>
> and make strndup_user() do the right thing if `count' turned out to be
> crazy large. THis way we don't have to sprinkle decisions about "crazy
> largeness" all over the kernel.
>
> And the way in which I suggest that strndup_user() decides whether the
> length is too great is to try to kmalloc that amount of memory.
> If it succeeds then fine, proceed.
I don't think that it is a good idea - the process would have an ability
to allocate too much system memory bypassing any limits. Assuming that
the kernel would only double the memory is not right - even if the
process is limited in physical memory it may pass address of e.g. mapped file.
Also this specific driver is happy with very low limit of copied string.
> If it fails then return an error,
> probably ENOMEM.
It is already done in strndup_user().
> And that attempt to invoke kmalloc() shouldn't spew a
> warning.
It is not obvious for me to change strndup_user's behaviour, I'm not
familiar with this code.
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists