[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101124191804.GH2815@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:18:04 -0500
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, sam@...nborg.org,
ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, michael@...erman.id.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] jump label: add enabled/disabled state to jump
label key entries
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:57:26AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:21 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
>
> > The keys are simply the address of a variable or structure (so as to be
> > unique). We can put pointers or anything else in the variable.
>
> Note, there is not a 1 to 1 with keys and places that need to be
> patched.
>
> Doing the following objdump:
>
> objdump -dr vmlinux | grep 'jmpq.*<trace_kmalloc' | wc -l
> 375
>
> That's 375 instances of kmalloc tracepoints[*] and one key. How do you
> handle this?
>
so there is 1 key associated with a kmalloc, call it key 'a'.
Then, each time a trace_kmalloc is found in the text it generates a
entry in the jump label section:
[to be patched address i] [address to jump to j] [key a]
[to be patched address k] [address to jump to l] [key a]
.
.
So when we do jump_label_enable(key a), we patch all addresses
associated with key a. Does this make sense?
> -- Steve
>
>
>
>
> [*] this should be fixed, we probably should find a way to move the
> tracepoint into the kmalloc functions that are not inlined.
>
I believe there are patches pending for this.
thanks,
-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists