[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290630157.14831.226.camel@ubuntu>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:22:37 -0600
From: Davy Durham <ddurham@...yandbeth.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: PID_MAX_LIMIT limit on ia32?
I have searched around without a definitive answer to my question.
PID_MAX_LIMIT is currently defined as:
/*
* A maximum of 4 million PIDs should be enough for a while.
* [NOTE: PID/TIDs are limited to 2^29 ~= 500+ million, see
futex.h.]
*/
#define PID_MAX_LIMIT (CONFIG_BASE_SMALL ? PAGE_SIZE * 8 :
(sizeof(long) > 4 ? 4 * 1024 * 1024 : PID_MAX_DEFAULT))
And PID_MAX_DEFAULT is normally 32k.
I found a comment on the net:
“When recycling PID numbers, the kernel must manage a
pidmap_array bitmap that denotes which are the PIDs currently
assigned and which are the free ones. Because a page frame
contains 32,768 bits, in 32-bit architectures the pidmap_array
bitmap is stored in a single page. In 64-bit architectures,
however, additional pages can be added to the bitmap when the
kernel assigns a PID number too large for the current bitmap
size. These pages are never released.”
Which may seem to indicate that PID_MAX_DEFAULT cannot be more than 1
memory page on 32bit archs.
Can the PID_MAX_LIMIT #define be increased safely on the ia32 arch which
would cause pidmap_array to use more than one memory page? (say 4 pages
or so).
I thought about just compiling it and testing things, but was unsure if
I would run into problems long-term.
[Please CC me on the response as I'm not currently subscribed]
TIA,
Davy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists