lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 01:38:12 +0300
From:	Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@....cs.msu.su>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Nikita V\. Youshchenko" <yoush@...msu.su>,
	linuxpps@...enneenne.com, Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
	"Alan \"I must be out of my tree\" Cox" <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	Philippe Langlais <philippe.langlais@...ricsson.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 05/17] tty: don't allow ldisc dcd_change() after ldisc
 halt

В Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:43:29 +0000
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> пишет:

> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:15:43 +0300
> Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@....cs.msu.su> wrote:
> 
> > There was a possibility that uart_handle_dcd_change() could obtain a
> > reference to ldisc while running in parallel with tty_set_ldisc() on
> > different CPU but call dcd_change() operation after
> > tty_ldisc_close() which is incorrect.
> 
> How can this occur ?
> 
> 
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->dcd_change_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +	ld = tty_ldisc_ref(tty);
> 
> What is the expecting lock ordering rule here ?
> 
> 
> 
> I don't see why this patch is needed. You've got an ldisc ref from
> tty_ldisc_ref, until you drop that ldisc ref you are fine. If for some
> reason that is not the case then there is a bug in the ldisc code.

Yes, indeed, it's a bug. Please consider the following example:

     CPU1                                      CPU2
=========================================================
uart_handle_dcd_change() {		tty_set_ldisc() {
  ld = tty_ldisc_ref(...)			  ...
  ...					  tty_ldisc_halt(...)
  ...					  ...
  ...					  tty_ldisc_close(...)
  if (ld && ld->ops->dcd_change)	  ...
    ld->ops->dcd_change(...);		  ...
  ...					  tty_ldisc_open(...)
}					}

I think that semantically ldisc ops should never be called before open
or after close. This situation is possible because tty_ldisc_halt() only
ensures that no more references are taken. This is ok for everything
except dcd_change() because it cleans up workqueue and doesn't accept
any more data. dcd_change() is a different story because it doesn't use
workqueues.

I think tty code is exactly the right place to fix this bug; this is
what my patch is for.

-- 
  Alexander

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ