[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290672009.2072.558.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:00:09 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv3] perf tools: add event grouping capability to
"perf stat"
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 08:46 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > perf record -e task-clock:freq=1000,cycles:period=0
>
> Wouldn't this syntax clash with the flags we have on events already?
>
> the u,k,p flags?
>From stephane's email (to which you were CC'ed) http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/23/303
> $ perf record -e cycles:u:period=100000,instructions:k:freq=1500 -a -- sleep 5
The parser isn't particularly pretty, maybe its time to think about a parser generator?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists