[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTiktTunH50a2aPCUeJEspEiOP3-fyCy1aWt4pXbZ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:46:01 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/22] m68knommu: introduce little-endian bitops
2010/11/23 Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>:
> Introduce little-endian bit operations by renaming native ext2 bit
> operations. The ext2 bit operations are kept as wrapper macros using
> little-endian bit operations to maintain bisectability until the
> conversions are finished.
This breaks the build on m68knommu.
lib/find_next_bit.c:190: error: conflicting types for 'find_next_zero_le_bit'
/home/mita/scm/linux-2.6/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h:286: error: previous
definition of 'find_next_zero_le_bit' was here
> @@ -271,10 +279,10 @@ static __inline__ int ext2_test_bit(int nr, const volatile void * addr)
> return retval;
> }
>
> -#define ext2_find_first_zero_bit(addr, size) \
> - ext2_find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), 0)
> +#define find_first_zero_le_bit(addr, size) \
> + find_next_zero_le_bit((addr), (size), 0)
>
> -static __inline__ unsigned long ext2_find_next_zero_bit(void *addr, unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
> +static inline unsigned long find_next_zero_le_bit(void *addr, unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
> {
> unsigned long *p = ((unsigned long *) addr) + (offset >> 5);
> unsigned long result = offset & ~31UL;
Because m68knommu selects CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT, it redefines
find_next_zero_le_bit() in lib/find_next_bit.c.
I'm going to fix it by introducing new CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_LE_BIT option.
CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_LE_BIT tells whether to use generic implementation of
find_*_le_bit() in lib/find_next_bit.c or not. It will not be selected by
m68knommu to use the optimized find_next_zero_le_bit().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists