[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290684033.2145.25.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:20:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: eranian@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com,
robert.richter@....com, acme@...hat.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup
monitoring (v5)
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 12:40 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> @@ -919,6 +945,10 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *task)
> static inline
> void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, struct task_struct *next)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
> + atomic_t *cgroup_events = &__get_cpu_var(perf_cgroup_events);
> + COND_STMT(cgroup_events, perf_cgroup_switch(task, next));
> +#endif
> COND_STMT(&perf_task_events, __perf_event_task_sched_out(task, next));
> }
I don't think that'll actually work, the jump label stuff needs a static
address.
Why not simply: s/perf_task_events/perf_sched_events/ and increment it
for cgroup events as well?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists