linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Prepare the tree for un-inlined jhash.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1011251439160.21752@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date:	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:39:49 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Prepare the tree for un-inlined jhash.

On Thursday 2010-11-25 14:15, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:

>jhash is widely used in the kernel and because the functions
>are inlined, the cost in size is significant. Also, the new jhash
>functions are slightly larger than the previous ones so better un-inline.
>As a preparation step, the calls to the internal macros are replaced
>with the plain jhash function calls.

Do you have a non-normative allyesconfig/allmodconfig build whose 
size(1) you can run on, to show approximately just how much it differs?


thanks,
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/