linux-kernel - Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTim9fPPWO-240dmavng+j=70G8Y4P-+j3Y+OZTL0@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:01:27 +0100
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	michael@...erman.id.au
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 14:34, Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> I've left for_each_child_of_node(), because I read it as "of", but maybe
> it's "OF"?

I always read it as "for each child-OF-node", so I would rename it to
"dt_for_each_child_node".

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/