linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] The new jhash implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1290693946.2858.323.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:05:46 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc:	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] The new jhash implementation

Le jeudi 25 novembre 2010 à 21:55 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :

> > I suggest :
> >
> > #include <linux/unaligned/packed_struct.h>
> > ...
> >        a += __get_unaligned_cpu32(k);
> >        b += __get_unaligned_cpu32(k+4);
> >        c += __get_unaligned_cpu32(k+8);
> >
> > Fits nicely in registers.
> >
> 
> I think you mean get_unaligned_le32().
> 

No, I meant __get_unaligned_cpu32()

We do same thing in jhash2() :

	a += k[0]; 
	b += k[1];
	c += k[2];

We dont care of bit order of the 32bit quantity we are adding to a,b or
c , as long its consistent for the current machine ;)

get_unaligned_le32() would be slow on big endian arches.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/