[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101125161550.GA2580@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:15:50 +0300
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Lin Mac <mkl0301@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: cns3xxx: Add architecture definition for
EHCI/OHCI controller
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:37:16AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > 2010/11/25 Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:25:38PM +0800, Lin Mac wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >> > Â #include <linux/module.h>
> > > >> > Â #include <linux/io.h>
> > > >> > Â #include <linux/delay.h>
> > > >> > +#include <asm/atomic.h>
> > > >> It's not necessary for mach/pm.h already included it, right?
> > > >
> > > > Technically, it's not necessary. But in Linux we don't rely on
> > > > headers including other headers.
>
> Just saw this. Don't be ridiculous -- this happens all over the place.
> People generally aren't aware of it, because it's next to impossible to
> verify that all the headers needed by a source file are included
> directly.
Sure. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't try to keep these things
sane enough.
I just noticed that the patch introduced atomic_t usage, but didn't
include asm/atomic.h, so I corrected this before applying that patch.
So I don't see what's the fuss is about. :-)
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists