linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=J_J68+758XOCYp=+YXaU1+yJjRrvBsAeB5eUi@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:24:22 -0500
From:	Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>
To:	Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
Cc:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com> wrote:
> On 10-11-24 11:41 PM, Greg Freemyer wrote:
>>
>> If you see a significant speed difference between mke2fs and running
>> wiper.sh on that same filesystem immediately after formatting, then
>> their is likely a bug worth chasing.
>
>
> You're right.  They're both equally slow on a blank Sandforce drive,
> taking about 83-90 seconds to TRIM 100GB.
>
> The difference being that mke2fs just sits there with zero indication
> or information as to what the huge delay is.
>
> It's a pity the TRIM commands are so sluggish on the Sandforce.
> It's a generation newer than the original Vertex, and TRIM is way faster
> on the older Vertex.  Not that either of them do it quickly enough that
> I'd ever want the kernel doing it automatically "on my behalf".
>
> The strange thing, is that when we TRIM the entire raw device,
> using ATA SECURITY ERASE, it takes less than 2 seconds.
>
> Cheers

Mark,

I'm away from my systems today, but is there an easy way to tweak
wiper.sh or hdparm to cause only a single range per trim command.

I'm curious if for the Sandforce that would still be in the 90 second
range, or closer to 64x that.

Or if there is a readily available userspace tool to invoke FITRIM and
you have a 2.6.37-rc? kernel, you could just time that on a newly
formatted drive.

Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/