[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290703485.2858.360.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:44:45 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Niels Möller <nisse@...ator.liu.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP_MAXSEG vs TCP/generic segmentation offload (tso/gso)
Le jeudi 25 novembre 2010 à 17:25 +0100, Niels Möller a écrit :
>
> I was under the impression that TSO (and maybe GSO) implied more
> cleverness in the network card; that the network card more or less gets
> to decide by itself how to divide a tcp stream into segments. And for
> example in the atl1c driver which I looked a bit into, this was what the
> REG_MTU register was for. Seems I have gotten this totally wrong.
>
You were not totally wrong, but device does not use its own MTU to
perform the split : We give it the MSS of the flow.
You can have multiple flows in parallel, each with its own MSS, while
device has a single MTU.
> Maybe Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt could clarify how it
> works. Currently, it says
>
> : Segmentation Offload (GSO, TSO) is an exception to this rule. The
> : upper layer protocol may pass a large socket buffer to the device
> : transmit routine, and the device will break that up into separate
> : packets based on the current MTU.
MTU means : maximum transmission unit. But each layer has its own :)
In this context, TCP protocol, so MSS should be taken into account.
By default, MSS derives from device MTU (ipv4 without options case :
MSS = MTU - 40), but user can change it with TCP_MAXSEG.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists