lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101126093107.e54847da.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:31:07 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 25

Hi Alan,

On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:25:18 +0000 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Umm where did all the x86 changes go ?
> 
> I was going to look at SEP and fixing it but I can't even build a base
> test tree from -next because all the x86 work seems to be missing from
> the tree from 23rd onwards.

You need to ask the x86, staging and tip maintainers ...  There was a
build failure in tip tree on Nov 23 after which the tip tree was rebuilt
without some of its branches.  Also, there is a boot failure caused by
the sep driver (which I see one of your patches should fix).

I did not remove any of the code.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ