[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101126093107.e54847da.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:31:07 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 25
Hi Alan,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:25:18 +0000 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Umm where did all the x86 changes go ?
>
> I was going to look at SEP and fixing it but I can't even build a base
> test tree from -next because all the x86 work seems to be missing from
> the tree from 23rd onwards.
You need to ask the x86, staging and tip maintainers ... There was a
build failure in tip tree on Nov 23 after which the tip tree was rebuilt
without some of its branches. Also, there is a boot failure caused by
the sep driver (which I see one of your patches should fix).
I did not remove any of the code.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists