[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <536589.12568.qm@web180310.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:59:37 -0800 (PST)
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: MugdhaKamoolkar <mugdha@...com>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
BenoitCousson <b-cousson@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
HariKanigeri <h-kanigeri2@...com>, SumanAnna <s-anna@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework
My rule of thumb is that nothing is "generic"
until at least three whatever-it-is instances
plug in to it. Sometimes this is called
the "Rule of Three".
Other than OMAP, what's providing hardware
spinlocks that plug into this framework?
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists