[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CEE0A66.6000409@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:04:06 +0900
From: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, h.mitake@...il.com,
Ma Ling <ling.ma@...el.com>, Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf bench: print both of prefaulted and no prefaulted
results
Really sorry for my late reply..
On 11/18/10 16:58, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Hitoshi Mitake<mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>> After applying this patch, perf bench mem memcpy prints
>> both of prefualted and without prefaulted score of memcpy().
>>
>> New options --no-prefault and --only-prefault are added
>> for printing single result, mainly for scripting usage.
>
> Ok. Mind resending the whole series once all review feedback has been
incorporated?
>
OK, I'll send the patch series for prefaulting and
porting memcpy_64.S to perf bench later.
This series do some dirty things especially in Makefile
of perf and defining ENTRY(). So I'd like to hear your comment.
Could you review these?
And I have another problem. I cannot see the name of
memcpy based on rep prefix because the symbol of it is ".Lmemcpy_c".
It seems that the symbol name start from "." cannot be seen
from other object files. So I have to seek the way to
find the name of rep memcpy...
Thanks,
Hitoshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists