linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip v4 3/3] kprobes: Support delayed unoptimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:27:46 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v4 3/3] kprobes: Support delayed unoptimization

(2010/11/26 16:26), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> 
>> Unoptimization occurs when a probe is unregistered or disabled, and
>> is heavy because it recovers instructions by using stop_machine().
>> This patch delays unoptimization operations and unoptimize several
>> probes at once by using text_poke_smp_batch().
>> This can avoid unexpected system slowdown coming from stop_machine().
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Use dynamic allocated buffers and params.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h |    4 
>>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c      |   45 ++++
>>  include/linux/kprobes.h        |    2 
>>  kernel/kprobes.c               |  434 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>  4 files changed, 344 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
> 
> Hm, this is a scary big patch with non-trivial effects - it should be broken up as 
> much as possible, into successive, bisectable steps. The end result looks mostly 
> fine - it's just this one huge step of a patch that is dangerous.

Agreed, then I'll break it down to several patches.
Thank you for your comment! :)

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/