[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin1Q0eo4mFbSCeO4RNrK8Men0Q3r_x9_dCse11Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:14:17 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ming.m.lin@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [rfc 1/3] perf, x86: P4 PMU - describe config format
Stephane, this is a misprint, I'll update this comments on format
(giod catch btw!). in real low 32 bits are considered as cccr in ht
mode. wait a bit, i'll post update.
On 11/26/10, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
> wrote:
>> Add description of .config in a sake of RAW events.
>> At least this should bring some light to those who
>> will be reading this code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
>> CC: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
>> CC: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h | 62
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
>> =====================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
>> +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
>> @@ -744,14 +744,6 @@ enum P4_ESCR_EMASKS {
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> - * P4 PEBS specifics (Replay Event only)
>> - *
>> - * Format (bits):
>> - * 0-6: metric from P4_PEBS_METRIC enum
>> - * 7 : reserved
>> - * 8 : reserved
>> - * 9-11 : reserved
>> - *
>> * Note we have UOP and PEBS bits reserved for now
>> * just in case if we will need them once
>> */
>> @@ -788,5 +780,59 @@ enum P4_PEBS_METRIC {
>> P4_PEBS_METRIC__max
>> };
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Notes on internal configuration of ESCR+CCCR tuples
>> + *
>> + * Since P4 has quite the different architecture of
>> + * performance registers in compare with "architectural"
>> + * once and we have on 64 bits to keep configuration
>> + * of performance event, the following trick is used.
>> + *
>> + * 1) Since both ESCR and CCCR registers have only low
>> + * 32 bits valuable, we pack them into a single 64 bit
>> + * configuration. Low 32 bits of such config correspond
>> + * to low 32 bits of CCCR register and high 32 bits
>> + * correspond to low 32 bits of ESCR register.
>> + *
>> + * 2) The meaning of every bit of such config field can
>> + * be found in Intel SDM but it should be noted that
>> + * we "borrow" some reserved bits for own usage and
>> + * clean them or set to a proper value when we do
>> + * a real write to hardware registers.
>> + *
>> + * 3) The format of bits of config is the following
>> + * and should be either 0 or set to some predefined
>> + * values:
>> + *
>> + * Low 32 bits
>> + * -----------
>> + * 0-6: P4_PEBS_METRIC enum
>> + * 7-11: reserved
>> + * 12: Active thread
>
> I don't understand bit 12. In the actual register, it
> corresponds to the enable bit. Seems you're overriding
> its usage. Do I interpret this as saying: 0 = enable when
> running on thread0, 1=monitoring when running on thread1?
> And if I don't care?
>
>
>
>> + * 13-15: reserved (ESCR select)
>> + * 16-17: Compare
>> + * 18: Complement
>> + * 20-23: Threshold
>> + * 24: Edge
>> + * 25: reserved (FORCE_OVF)
>> + * 26: reserved (OVF_PMI_T0)
>> + * 27: reserved (OVF_PMI_T1)
>> + * 28-29: reserved
>> + * 30: reserved (Cascade)
>> + * 31: reserved (OVF)
>> + *
>> + * High 32 bits
>> + * ------------
>> + * 0: reserved (T1_USR)
>> + * 1: reserved (T1_OS)
>> + * 2: reserved (T0_USR)
>> + * 3: reserved (T0_OS)
>> + * 4: Tag Enable
>> + * 5-8: Tag Value
>> + * 9-24: Event Mask (may use P4_ESCR_EMASK_BIT helper)
>> + * 25-30: enum P4_EVENTS
>> + * 31: reserved (HT thread)
>> + */
>> +
>> #endif /* PERF_EVENT_P4_H */
>>
>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists