lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-335d7afbfb71faac833734a94240c1e07cf0ead8@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:02:45 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] mutexes, sched: Introduce arch_mutex_cpu_relax()

Commit-ID:  335d7afbfb71faac833734a94240c1e07cf0ead8
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/335d7afbfb71faac833734a94240c1e07cf0ead8
Author:     Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:47:36 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:05:34 +0100

mutexes, sched: Introduce arch_mutex_cpu_relax()

The spinning mutex implementation uses cpu_relax() in busy loops as a
compiler barrier. Depending on the architecture, cpu_relax() may do more
than needed in this specific mutex spin loops. On System z we also give
up the time slice of the virtual cpu in cpu_relax(), which prevents
effective spinning on the mutex.

This patch replaces cpu_relax() in the spinning mutex code with
arch_mutex_cpu_relax(), which can be defined by each architecture that
selects HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX. The default is still cpu_relax(), so
this patch should not affect other architectures than System z for now.

Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1290437256.7455.4.camel@...nkpad>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 arch/Kconfig                  |    3 +++
 arch/s390/Kconfig             |    1 +
 arch/s390/include/asm/mutex.h |    2 ++
 include/linux/mutex.h         |    4 ++++
 kernel/mutex.c                |    2 +-
 kernel/sched.c                |    3 ++-
 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 8bf0fa65..f78c2be 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -175,4 +175,7 @@ config HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI
 config HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
 	bool
 
+config HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
+	bool
+
 source "kernel/gcov/Kconfig"
diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index e0b98e7..6c6d7b3 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ config S390
 	select HAVE_KERNEL_LZMA
 	select HAVE_KERNEL_LZO
 	select HAVE_GET_USER_PAGES_FAST
+	select HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
 	select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK
 	select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK_BH
 	select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mutex.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mutex.h
index 458c1f7..688271f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mutex.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mutex.h
@@ -7,3 +7,5 @@
  */
 
 #include <asm-generic/mutex-dec.h>
+
+#define arch_mutex_cpu_relax()	barrier()
diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
index f363bc8..94b48bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -160,4 +160,8 @@ extern int mutex_trylock(struct mutex *lock);
 extern void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock);
 extern int atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(atomic_t *cnt, struct mutex *lock);
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
+#define arch_mutex_cpu_relax()	cpu_relax()
+#endif
+
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
index 200407c..a5889fb 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
 		 * memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right
 		 * values at the cost of a few extra spins.
 		 */
-		cpu_relax();
+		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
 	}
 #endif
 	spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 3e8a7db..abe7aec 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
+#include <asm/mutex.h>
 
 #include "sched_cpupri.h"
 #include "workqueue_sched.h"
@@ -3888,7 +3889,7 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner)
 		if (task_thread_info(rq->curr) != owner || need_resched())
 			return 0;
 
-		cpu_relax();
+		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
 	}
 
 	return 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ