[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CEFE2AF.2040705@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:39:11 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [thiscpuops upgrade 03/10] percpu: Generic support for this_cpu_add,sub,dec,inc_return
On 11/26/2010 05:37 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> If we're gonna do __VA_ARGS__, can't we just replace
>> __pcpu_size_call_return()? Other than that, looks good to me.
>
> A single parameter would require an empty vaarg list. All single parameter
> invocations would have to specify an empty additional parameter.
Argh... okay.
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists