[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290790791.2855.259.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:59:51 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: use this_cpu_{read|write} api on printk_pending
Le vendredi 26 novembre 2010 à 10:40 -0600, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> This only works if printk_needs_cpu is always passed the current cpu. The
> check for cpu_is_offline suggests that the function is also used for other
> cpus. The __this_cpu_read() will then get the printk_pending stat for the
> current cpu and not for the specified cpu.
>
>
I guess you read the changelog too fast ;)
I posted this patch after noticing printk_needs_cpu() was always used
for the current cpu.
We have other functions around, that always work for the current cpu.
We pass cpu as a parameter, mostly because smp_processor_id() was a bit
expensive in old kernels, and is still expensive because of sanity
tests.
Now we have this_cpu_ api, we probably can do a cleanup to avoid now
useless parameter passing.
If we had this_cpu_is_online() function, we could avoid (int cpu) param
in printk_needs_cpu()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists