[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201011262042.21444.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 20:42:21 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: roland@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"rjw@...k.plpavel"@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] freezer: remove superflous try_to_freeze() loop in do_signal_stop()
On Friday, November 26, 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> do_signal_stop() is used only by get_signal_to_deliver() and after a
> successful signal stop, it always calls try_to_freeze(), so the
> try_to_freeze() loop around schedule() in do_signal_stop() is
> superflous and confusing. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Thanks!
> ---
> kernel/signal.c | 4 +---
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index fe004b5..0a6816a 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1781,9 +1781,7 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
> }
>
> /* Now we don't run again until woken by SIGCONT or SIGKILL */
> - do {
> - schedule();
> - } while (try_to_freeze());
> + schedule();
>
> tracehook_finish_jctl();
> current->exit_code = 0;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists