[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ebd30eb40bc876676f905c1d5db687b0f0627580.1290742567.git.dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:28:27 +0800
From: Dongdong Deng <libfetion@...il.com>
To: jason.wessel@...driver.com
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yong.zhang0@...il.com, libfetion@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] debug_core: replace atomic_set() with atomic_xchg() for atomic kgdb_active
The atomic_set() don't imply memory barriers, therefor the single
stepping processor could not observe the changing of kgdb_active
value which was done at other cpu immediately.
Using atomic_xchg() to replace atomic_set() to change kgdb_active,
as it implys the memory barrier semantics around the atomic_xchg().
Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <libfetion@...il.com>
---
kernel/debug/debug_core.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/debug/debug_core.c b/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
index bec8af0..722968f 100644
--- a/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
+++ b/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ return_normal:
if (atomic_read(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step) != -1 &&
(kgdb_info[cpu].task &&
kgdb_info[cpu].task->pid != kgdb_sstep_pid) && --sstep_tries) {
- atomic_set(&kgdb_active, -1);
+ atomic_xchg(&kgdb_active, -1);
raw_spin_unlock(&dbg_master_lock);
dbg_touch_watchdogs();
local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ kgdb_restore:
smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
atomic_dec(&masters_in_kgdb);
/* Free kgdb_active */
- atomic_set(&kgdb_active, -1);
+ atomic_xchg(&kgdb_active, -1);
raw_spin_unlock(&dbg_master_lock);
dbg_touch_watchdogs();
local_irq_restore(flags);
--
1.6.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists