[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201011271437.38126.thomas.schlichter@web.de>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:37:37 +0100
From: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@....de>
To: Michal Januszewski <spock@...too.org>
Cc: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] uvesafb,vesafb: create write-combining or write-back PAT entries
Hi,
with an PAT-enabled kernel (tested with 2.6.35, but the problem is still
present in current -tip), when using uvesafb or vesafb, these drivers will
create uncached-minus PAT entries for the framebuffer memory because they use
ioremap() (not the *_cached or *_wc variants). When the framebuffer memory
intersects with the video RAM used by Xorg, the complete video RAM will be
mapped uncached-minus what results in a serve performance penalty.
Here are the correct MTRR entries created by uvesafb:
schlicht@...book:~$ cat /proc/mtrr
reg00: base=0x000000000 ( 0MB), size= 2048MB, count=1: write-back
reg01: base=0x06ff00000 ( 1791MB), size= 1MB, count=1: uncachable
reg02: base=0x070000000 ( 1792MB), size= 256MB, count=1: uncachable
reg03: base=0x0d0000000 ( 3328MB), size= 16MB, count=1: write-combining
And here are the problematic PAT entries:
schlicht@...book:~$ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/x86/pat_memtype_list
PAT memtype list:
write-back @ 0x0-0x1000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fedd000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee3000-0x6fee4000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee3000-0x6fee4000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee3000-0x6fee4000
uncached-minus @ 0xd0000000-0xe0000000 <-- created by xserver-xorg
uncached-minus @ 0xd0000000-0xd1194000 <-- created by uvesafb
uncached-minus @ 0xf4000000-0xf4009000
uncached-minus @ 0xf4200000-0xf4400000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5000000-0xf5010000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5100000-0xf5104000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5400000-0xf5404000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5404000-0xf5405000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5404000-0xf5405000
uncached-minus @ 0xfed00000-0xfed01000
Therefore I created the attached patch for uvesafb which uses ioremap_wc() to
create the correct PAT entries, as shown below:
schlicht@...book:~$ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/x86/pat_memtype_list
PAT memtype list:
write-back @ 0x0-0x1000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fedd000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee2000-0x6fee3000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee3000-0x6fee4000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee3000-0x6fee4000
uncached-minus @ 0x6fee3000-0x6fee4000
write-combining @ 0xd0000000-0xe0000000
write-combining @ 0xd0000000-0xd1194000
uncached-minus @ 0xf4000000-0xf4009000
uncached-minus @ 0xf4200000-0xf4400000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5000000-0xf5010000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5100000-0xf5104000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5400000-0xf5404000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5404000-0xf5405000
uncached-minus @ 0xf5404000-0xf5405000
uncached-minus @ 0xfed00000-0xfed01000
This results in a performance gain, objectively measurable with e.g.
x11perf -comppixwin10 -comppixwin100 -comppixwin500:
1: x11perf_xaa.log
2: x11perf_xaa_patched.log
1 2 Operation
-------- ----------------- -----------------
124000.0 202000.0 ( 1.63) Composite 10x10 from pixmap to window
3340.0 24400.0 ( 7.31) Composite 100x100 from pixmap to window
131.0 1150.0 ( 8.78) Composite 500x500 from pixmap to window
You can see the serve performance gain when composing larger pixmaps to
window.
Please consider applying the attached patches for uvesafb and vesafb.
These patches (for -tip) replace the ioremap() function with the variants
matching the mtrr-parameter. To create "write-back" PAT entries, the
ioremap_cache() function must be called after creating the MTRR entries, and
the ioremap_cache() region must completely fit into the MTRR region, this is
why the MTRR region size is now rounded up to the next power-of-two.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@....de>
Thank you very much!
Kind regards,
Thomas
View attachment "vesafb.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (2418 bytes)
View attachment "uvesafb.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (2607 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists