linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] backing-dev: replace private thread pool with workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CF16A4E.106@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:30:06 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] backing-dev: replace private thread pool with   workqueue

Hello,

On 11/27/2010 07:50 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> cmwq now seems pretty solid.  There hasn't been any noticeable failure
>> yet.  I think we can move on with this conversion now.  Shall I
>> refresh the patchset against the current block tree?
> 
> I'd still prefer to wait a while. The writeback code is still very much
> a moving target, so I don't think mixing in a different work queue
> scheme is likely going to do anyone any good at this point in time.

Alright, will ping again after the next merge window.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/