linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Provide pm_runtime_no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101127003737.GB4777@sortiz-mobl>
Date:	Sat, 27 Nov 2010 01:37:38 +0100
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Provide pm_runtime_no_callbacks flag in cell
 data

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> Allow MFD cells to have pm_runtime_no_callbacks() called on them during
> registration. This causes the runtime PM framework to ignore them,
> allowing use of runtime PM to suspend the device as a whole even if
> not all drivers for the MFD can usefully implement runtime PM. For
> example, RTCs are likely to run continuously regardless of the power
> state of the system.
Makes sense, both patches applied.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/