lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:59:26 -0200
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] perf tools: Fix lost and unknown events handling

Ingo,
	
	I added this one and removed the GCC optimization (alloc_size
attribute), please consider pulling from:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux-2.6 perf/core

	Thomas, I hope this one is better?

	At some point I'll work on i18n these messages...

- Arnaldo

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fix it by explaining what can be happening and giving the number of processed
and lost events.

Also holler if unknown events were found, that can be due to processing a
perf.data file collected using a newer tool where newer events got added on
reporting using an older perf tool, that or a bug, so ask for a report to be
made.

Works on both --tui and --stdio.

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/debug.c   |   11 +++++++++++
 tools/perf/util/debug.h   |    2 ++
 tools/perf/util/session.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/util/ui/util.c |   16 +++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/debug.c b/tools/perf/util/debug.c
index c8d81b0..e5161e8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/debug.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/debug.c
@@ -46,6 +46,17 @@ int dump_printf(const char *fmt, ...)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+#ifdef NO_NEWT_SUPPORT
+void ui__warning(const char *format, ...)
+{
+	va_list args;
+
+	va_start(args, format);
+	vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
+	va_end(args);
+}
+#endif
+
 static int dump_printf_color(const char *fmt, const char *color, ...)
 {
 	va_list args;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/debug.h b/tools/perf/util/debug.h
index 7b51408..ca35fd6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/debug.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/debug.h
@@ -35,4 +35,6 @@ int ui_helpline__show_help(const char *format, va_list ap);
 #include "ui/progress.h"
 #endif
 
+void ui__warning(const char *format, ...) __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)));
+
 #endif	/* __PERF_DEBUG_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index 3d56047..3ae6955 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -852,6 +852,24 @@ done:
 	flush_sample_queue(self, ops);
 out_err:
 	ui_progress__delete(progress);
+
+	if (ops->lost == event__process_lost &&
+	    self->hists.stats.total_lost != 0) {
+		ui__warning("Processed %Lu events and LOST %Lu!\n\n"
+			    "Check IO/CPU overload!\n\n",
+			    self->hists.stats.total_period,
+			    self->hists.stats.total_lost);
+	}
+	
+	if (self->hists.stats.nr_unknown_events != 0) {
+		ui__warning("Found %u unknown events!\n\n"
+			    "Is this an older tool processing a perf.data "
+			    "file generated by a more recent tool?\n\n"
+			    "If that is not the case, consider "
+			    "reporting to linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org.\n\n",
+			    self->hists.stats.nr_unknown_events);
+	}
+		
 	return err;
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/ui/util.c b/tools/perf/util/ui/util.c
index 056c695..7b5a892 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/ui/util.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/ui/util.c
@@ -104,10 +104,24 @@ out_destroy_form:
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static const char yes[] = "Yes", no[] = "No";
+static const char yes[] = "Yes", no[] = "No",
+		  warning_str[] = "Warning!", ok[] = "Ok";
 
 bool ui__dialog_yesno(const char *msg)
 {
 	/* newtWinChoice should really be accepting const char pointers... */
 	return newtWinChoice(NULL, (char *)yes, (char *)no, (char *)msg) == 1;
 }
+
+void ui__warning(const char *format, ...)
+{
+	va_list args;
+
+	va_start(args, format);
+	if (use_browser > 0)
+		newtWinMessagev((char *)warning_str, (char *)ok,
+				(char *)format, args);
+	else
+		vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
+	va_end(args);
+}
-- 
1.7.1.rc2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ