lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:57:00 +0100
From:	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sakari.ailus@...well.research.nokia.com, lennart@...ttering.net
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v6 03/12] media: Entities, pads and links

On Sunday, November 28, 2010 13:34:45 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> On Friday 26 November 2010 15:14:42 Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:13:36PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Thursday 25 November 2010 16:49:52 Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > > It's supposed to reflect whether the link can carry data. Think of
> > > > > the active flag as a valve on a pipe. If the valve is open, the link
> > > > > is active. If the valve is closed, the link is inactive. This is
> > > > > unrelated to whether water actually flows through the pipe.
> > > > 
> > > > This seems a confusing name, then - I'd expect an active link to be one
> > > > which is actually carrying data rather than one which is available to
> > > > carry data.  How a more neutrally worded name such as "connected"
> > > > (which is what ASoC uses currently)?
> > > 
> > > In our current vocabulary "connected" refers to entities between which a
> > > link exist, regardless of the link state ("valve opened" or "valve
> > > closed"). I'm not totally happy with "active" either, but if we replace
> > > it with "connected" we need another word to replace current uses of
> > > "connected".
> > 
> > Linked?
> 
> That's a good option. Hans, do you want to comment on this ?
> 
> 

Fine by me! It's better than 'active'.

Regards,

	Hans

-- 
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by Cisco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ