lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011271750140.3764@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:52:03 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...el.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2 v2] mm: add node hotplug emulation

On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Greg KH wrote:

> > Add an interface to allow new nodes to be added when performing memory
> > hot-add.  This provides a convenient interface to test memory hotplug
> > notifier callbacks and surrounding hotplug code when new nodes are
> > onlined without actually having a machine with such hotpluggable SRAT
> > entries.
> > 
> > This adds a new debugfs interface at /sys/kernel/debug/hotplug/add_node
> 
> The rule for debugfs is "there are no rules", but perhaps you might want
> to name "hotplug" a bit more specific for what you are doing?  "hotplug"
> means pretty much anything these days, so how about s/hotplug/node/
> instead as that is what you are controlling.
> 
> Just a suggestion...
> 

Hmm, how strongly do you feel about that?  There's nothing node specific 
in the memory hotplug code where this lives, so we'd probably have to 
define the dentry elsewhere and even then it would only needed for 
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG.

I personally don't see this as a node debugging but rather memory hotplug 
callback debugging.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ