[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101129082916.GA12374@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:29:16 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip
tree related)
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:39:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c:54: error: redefinition of 'touch_nmi_watchdog'
> > include/linux/nmi.h:21: note: previous definition of 'touch_nmi_watchdog' was here
> >
> > Caused (or, at least exposed) by commit
> > 5f2b0ba4d94b3ac23cbc4b7f675d98eb677a760a ("x86, nmi_watchdog: Remove the
> > old nmi_watchdog"). Sparc appears to have a touch_nmi_watchdog() and
> > defines ARCH_HAS_NMI_WATCHDOG but not CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR.
> >
> > I have reverted that commit for today (as well as commit
> > 072b198a4ad48bd722ec6d203d65422a4698eae7 "x86, nmi_watchdog: Remove all
> > stub function calls from old nmi_watchdog" that depends on it).
>
> This build failure is back, so I have reverted the above commits again.
Don, have you got a fix for that?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists