[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101129091920.GB13902@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:19:20 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: demultiplex xfs_icsb_modify_counters()
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:36:41AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
>
> With the conversion to percpu counters, xfs_icsb_modify_counters() really does
> not need to exist. Convert the inode counter modifications to use a common
> helper function for the one place that calls them, and add another function for
> the free block modification and convert all the callers to use that.
> +xfs_icsb_modify_inodes(
> + xfs_mount_t *mp,
struct xfs_mount, please.
> + int cntr,
> + int64_t delta,
> + int rsvd)
the rsvd argument isn't used at all.
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ASSERT(cntr == XFS_ICSB_ICOUNT || cntr == XFS_ICSB_IFREE);
> +
> + ret = xfs_icsb_add(mp, cntr, delta, 0);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + ASSERT(0);
> + return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> + }
> + return 0;
You could get rdif of the ret argument as we don't care about the
value. I also don't think we need the assert here - the caller already
does one for us.
> +xfs_icsb_modify_free_blocks(
> + xfs_mount_t *mp,
same here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists